Introduction
The Citizen’s Action Committee on the closures of Burtch Correctional Centre and the Brantford Jail was formed after the government announcement of the closure of these two institutions in their restructuring plans. The Committee, formed from affected employees, community leaders, business leaders, lawyers and other parties interested in the justice field, proposed a regional Correctional Centre on the Burtch property. This included maintaining the present correctional Centre and the building of a Maplehurst style Detention Centre with shared services. This would provide several benefits:
The Maplehurst design was chosen as it could be expanded to if the need arises due to its modular design. It is currently being done at Maplehurst. This would keep the initial capital investment down, with an easy method to expand if required.
Methods
It must be emphasized that some information was difficult to obtain. Estimates were based on current and past trends. Several documents were quite useful in estimating the cost of a combined centre. These include:
Capital Costs of Construction and retrofitting the current Burtch CC were not included, as the capital costs of the "mega jails" were not included in their per diems.
Several assumptions were made in the calculations:
Table 1: Fiscal 1998/99 statistics for the Brantford Jail and Burtch Correctional Centre
Fiscal 1998/99 |
Brantford Jail |
Burtch CC |
Average |
Average daily count |
83 |
175 |
|
Estimated total days stay |
30315.75 |
63918.75 |
|
Total budget (x1000) |
\\$3,597 |
\\$9,550 |
|
Salary budget (x1000) |
\\$2,578 |
\\$8,352 |
|
% of budget salaries |
72% |
87% |
80% |
Per Diem |
\\$118.65 |
\\$149.41 |
Findings and Conclusions
It is interesting to note that both Burtch CC and the Brantford Jail have both operated below the Ministry average per diem rates for several years(Table 2). Also, the Brantford Jail ( of which there is more data) shows that the per diem increase was often less or close to the inflation rate (Table 3). This indicates the efficiency and dedication of both institutions’ staff to deliver effective and efficient service.
The assumption that the new institution would operate at capacity means that per diem rates would be kept low. Per Diem rates and counts are quite interdependent. It was found that increasing Butch CC’s count by one Unit (60 inmates) reduced the Per Diem by 25%!
The combined institution would have many shared services, including all administration, records, food services, health care, classification and maintenance. The total staff of the new institution would be 203. This represents approximately 90% of the current staff of both Burtch CC and the Brantford Jail (currently 222 staff). This would be easily absorbed through attrition. The new institution would see a 70% increase in efficiency, with a 1:3.14 staff:inmate ratio. (old ratio of Brantford Jail plus Burtch CC is 1:1.85)
The Estimated Per Diem of the Combined facility is
\\$67.18 . This is below the anticipated per diem of the Mega Jails. This might be a reflection of the efficiency of a minimum/medium correctional centre over a maximum security facility. It is estimated that adding 10 staff to this facility would only increase the per diem by \\$3, still below the projected mega jail per diem.
Table 2: Statistics from 1992-1996 for Burtch Correctional Centre and Brantford Jail
BRANTFORD JAIL |
BURTCH CC |
Ministry AV |
|||||
EXPENDITURE |
TOTAL DAYS STAY |
PER DIEM |
EXPENDITURE |
TOTAL DAYS STAY |
PER DIEM |
||
92-93 |
\\$3,145,682 |
30603 |
\\$102.79 |
||||
93-94 |
\\$3,214,884 |
30310 |
\\$106.67 |
\\$10,562,500 |
87347 |
\\$120.93 |
\\$128.42 |
94-95 |
\\$3,204,419 |
29198 |
\\$109.75 |
\\$9,873,939 |
85445 |
\\$115.56 |
\\$120.97 |
95-96 |
\\$3,379,710 |
30295 |
\\$111.56 |
||||
96-97 |
\\$3,555,134 |
31755 |
\\$112.27 |
Table 3: Inflation Rate (CPI) and Expenditure for Brantford Jail from 1992-1996
Appendix
Combined Institution Staffing Levels and Projections
Burtch DC |
||
Maximum Count |
278 |
|
Total days Stay |
101470 |
|
Correctional Officers |
Total Hours Coverage/Day |
|
Officers for unlock period (16h) |
20 |
320 |
Officers for Nights (8h) |
8 |
64 |
Total |
384 |
|
Total Hours Coverage/Year |
140160 |
|
Total # Officers |
82 |
|
Operational Managers |
5 |
Burtch CC |
||
Maximum Count |
360 |
|
Total days Stay |
131400 |
|
Correctional Officers |
Total Hours Coverage/Day |
|
Minimum Units (4) |
||
Officers per 24 hr period |
2 |
192 |
Medium Unit |
||
Officers for unlock period (16h) |
3 |
48 |
Officers for night period (8h) |
2 |
16 |
Duty Office |
||
Officers/24 hr period |
2 |
48 |
A & D |
||
Officers/8 hrs |
2 |
16 |
Programs |
||
Weekday (12hr) |
4 |
48 |
Weekend (12hr) |
1 |
3 |
Total |
371 |
|
Total Hours Coverage/Year |
135571 |
|
Total # Officers |
80 |
|
Operational Managers |
5 |
Shared Staff |
|
Superintendent |
1 |
Deputy Operations |
1 |
Deputy Programs |
1 |
Records |
5 |
Classification/EM |
3 |
Staff Training OM |
1 |
Staff Scheduling OM |
1 |
Office management |
3 |
Health Care |
5 |
Food Services |
5 |
Maintenance |
4 |
Drivers |
1 |
Total |
31 |
Summary |
|
Total staff |
203 |
Average salary |
\\$61,595.00 |
Total staff Costs |
\\$12,515,793.44 |
Total Days Stay |
232870 |
Estimated Budget |
\\$15,644,741.80 |
Estimated Per Diem |
\\$67.18 |